²Ù±ÆÊÓƵapp

2019-UNAT-965, Alkarazoun

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that the Appellant simply put forward several general complaints related to the alleged merits of her case but did not argue that the judgment was defective or that UNRWA DT committed an error in deciding that her application was not receivable. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNRWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to grant her a promotion after she had requested one. UNRWA DT dismissed the Applicant’s application as not receivable ratione materiae on the grounds that her application failed to articulate a contested administrative decision and not receivable ratione temporis as her application had been filed more than a year after the deadline.

Legal Principle(s)

On appeal, an appellant has the burden to establish that the UNDT judgment is defective; it is not sufficient for an appellant to state he or she disagrees with the outcome or repeat arguments submitted before UNDT.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.