2010-UNAT-017 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2010-UNAT-017, Skoda

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The former staff member appealed and UNAT considered whether he could compel UNICEF to pay to the Fund its contribution without making the corresponding contribution himself. UNAT found that, as the former staff member’s secondment was with the World Bank, he should have availed himself of the provisions of Article 13 of the UNJSPF Regulations relating to the transfer of pension rights and he failed to do so. Under these circumstances, UNAT noted that if the former staff member made his own contribution to the Fund, UNICEF would have been duty-bound to make its corresponding contribution. Since he failed to perform his duty in this regard, UNAT held that he could not expect UNICEF to perform its corresponding duty to make contributions on his account. UNAT accordingly dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

UNJSPB decision: UNJSPF records showed that the former staff member was a participant for two periods: 2 April 1976 to 14 June 1987 and 30 December 1989 to 31 January 1995. The records also showed that, during his break in service, while on secondment with the World Bank, he did not contribute to the Fund. UNJSPB held that the former staff member accordingly could not succeed in getting contributory service to accrue in his favor for the period of the secondment.

Legal Principle(s)

Contributory service may accrue in respect of leave without pay if contributions are received by the Fund in accordance with Article 25(b). Contributions for the purpose of article 22(b) in respect of a period of leave without pay shall be at a percentage rate of pensionable remuneration of the participant equal to the applicable rates specified in Article 25(a) above as payable by the participant and by the employing member Organisation, combined. Such contributions shall be payable concurrently with such leave, by the participant in full or by the Organisation in full, or in part by the participant and in part by the Organisation. UNJSPB may, subject to the concurrence of the General Assembly, approve agreements with the Member States of a member Organisation and with intergovernmental Organisations, with a view to securing continuity of pension rights between the governments of such States or Organisations and the Fund.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Skoda

Entity

UNJSPF

Case Number(s)

2010-022

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York